http://bostonist.com/2005/05/31/impeachment_seriously.php All comments for Impeachment? Seriously? en-us 2008 cheap_robv Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:00:00 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss rvassegh@gmail.com rvassegh@gmail.com 60 http://bostonist.com/2005/05/31/impeachment_seriously.php#comment-150393 http://bostonist.com/2005/05/31/impeachment_seriously.php#comment-150393 Comments Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:41:51 -0500 <p>More discussion here on MetaFilter.</p> http://bostonist.com/2005/05/31/impeachment_seriously.php#comment-150389 http://bostonist.com/2005/05/31/impeachment_seriously.php#comment-150389 Comments Tue, 31 May 2005 15:24:14 -0500 <p>on second thought, compared to the Bush administration's grasp on reality, Nader's practically keepin it real. </p> http://bostonist.com/2005/05/31/impeachment_seriously.php#comment-150388 http://bostonist.com/2005/05/31/impeachment_seriously.php#comment-150388 Comments Tue, 31 May 2005 15:22:22 -0500 <p>ed was crazy enough to vote for Nader the first time he ran, but not the second. i mean, nice idea guys, i'm not a huge bush fan myself, but impeachment? they just had an election. nader just continues his dutiful march towards irrelevence. makes me sad. </p>