<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Republicans in...Cambridge!?</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2005/06/13/republicans_incambridge.php</link>
<description>All comments for Republicans in...Cambridge!?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 cheap_robv</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rvassegh@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rvassegh@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Jesse</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2005/06/13/republicans_incambridge.php#comment-150465</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2005/06/13/republicans_incambridge.php#comment-150465</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 12:39:33 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Constantine - I&apos;m pretty sure that, no, there isn&apos;t a registered Republican on the council right now. There is Tim Toomey who is a pretty conservative Democrat (in some regards at least). But, I could be wrong. Do you know who you think it is?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Jesse</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2005/06/13/republicans_incambridge.php#comment-150462</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2005/06/13/republicans_incambridge.php#comment-150462</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:55:49 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;
...He knows better than to mention Bush to me...


I have no doubt whatsoever that Andre is a very good guy, and I am heartened to hear he was a staunch McCain man in &apos;00. Though I also hope for his sake that Andre knows better than to mention Bush at all in public in Cambridge ;-)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>R. S. Buchanan</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2005/06/13/republicans_incambridge.php#comment-150460</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2005/06/13/republicans_incambridge.php#comment-150460</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:14:39 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;ve known Andre for a few years, and he is many things, but a Bible thumper ain&apos;t one of &apos;em.

He is a Republican in the old-fashioned fiscal conservative/social liberal style, and my recollection is he was a pretty staunch McCain man in &apos;00. He knows better than to mention Bush to me, given that I worked on the Ann Richards campaigns in &apos;90 and &apos;94, so I don&apos;t know if he has any use at all for the man.

He&apos;s a smart, funny guy who is usually well-spoken and who should at least comport himself well during the campaign.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Constantine</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2005/06/13/republicans_incambridge.php#comment-150459</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2005/06/13/republicans_incambridge.php#comment-150459</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:49:24 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;In defense of the Cambridge city council, they don&apos;t actually have the power to do anything. Operational authority in the city is vested in the city manager. As a consequence, the main responisbilities of the city council are to vote on naming street corners after local personalities and pass resolutions of the type described above.

And for some reason I thought one of the Cambridge city council members was already a registered republican. Given that the elections themselves are non-partisan, one doesn&apos;t tend to know the party affiliation of the candidates unless they announce it or you take the time to check the voter rolls yourself.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Joel</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2005/06/13/republicans_incambridge.php#comment-150457</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2005/06/13/republicans_incambridge.php#comment-150457</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:56:13 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;as long as he&apos;s not a neocon bible thumper then he&apos;s a-ok by me!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>