Stylish Bostonians Have Nice Clothes, Lack Self-Awareness
Close to the Edge: Near Death on the Orange Line
This Week In Booze: If You Build It
Randazza Served and Pwnd Glen Beck in 2009
The Mass. House of Representatives has passed a bill that, if approved by the Senate, would raise fines for Fenway parking lot operators who jack up their prices on game days. Bostonist can't really argue with this move, but we wonder how much a $1,000 fine (as opposed to the current $300) will deter people who are making upwards of $50 per car. We imagine their business philosophy is much like our parking philosophy: We never ever pay for parking, preferring to park illegally (or walk a little farther) instead. Most times, the fine we might have to pay if we get a ticket doesn't cost much more than the money we will definitely pay if we put the car in a lot, and we frequently don't get a ticket at all (but we are careful to avoid tow zones). Bostonist is not alone in concluding that statistically, risking the fine beats following the rules. (Best of all, of course, is to ride one's bicycle to the park, as we usually do.)
More important, we think, is the larger issue presented here about transportation policy. We have heard that some cities with traffic problems like ours are trying to make urban driving prohibitively expensive. Boston, on the other hand, has gleefully poured millions billions into making downtown more car-friendly, with a smaller, cheaper afterthought of a project to add some mass transit. (Don't misunderstand us - we prefer the Big Dig to what preceded it; we're just trying to make a point about legislative priorities.) Bostonist (admittedly just an opinionated wise-ass and not an urban planner) wonders whether there isn't a way to decrease the demand for parking near Fenway, thus removing the opportunity for price gouging. Maybe the key is to let prices near the park be totally unregulated while providing heavily discounted (or free) parking in Malden, Roxbury, and Newton, creating financial incentives for fans to take the T (of course, the MBTA might have to do something about the late-night schedules, too). Better yet, the city could levy heavy taxes on lots near Fenway (making driving into town less appealing) and use the money to subsidize cheap parking elsewhere. (To those who think that people who really love to drive will never voluntarily suffer to the indignities of public transit, Bostonist suggests that money can be more persuasive than you might imagine.) Our plan also offers other public benefits: (1) fans who may have had one too many get a little more time to sober up before getting behind the wheel, and (2) suburbanites get to enjoy the unique experience of the post-game atmosphere among Sox fans on the green line.
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
I think that eveyone involved with this issue should be forced to take a C line train from Copley to an above ground stop past Kenmore, at rush hour, before any night game. Preferably after a long day at work.
Are you saying that anyone well-acquainted with the C-line's impossibly slow pace and generally crowded, stuffy unpleasantness wouldn't seriously suggest getting people to take the T to ball games?
... because if that's what you're saying, I heartily disagree. Although my current abode makes bicycling more convenient than taking the T, I'm a life-long mass-transit user (in four different cities) and I know all too well the misery of crowded trains when my patience and will to live are already worn thin by the daily grind. I don't doubt that the addition of bright-eyed, baseball-eager out-of-towners would make the commute that much more miserable. But come on - that's what public transportation is for - to transport the public! The influx of people to the city for ball games (and other events) is inevitable, so of course they will add to the crowds somewhere. The question is, would we rather have them add to the crowds on the green line between downtown and Kenmore, or to the crowded roads everywhere inside 128? I vote for the former: moving people by mass transit is cheaper (not just for the people involved, but for the public, when you figure in road maintenance, pollution, accidents, etc.), cleaner, and keeps the roads clear for people who really need them (emergency vehicles, the disabled, delivery trucks, pedestrians, cyclists). It can't be true that the only answer to overcrowding on the T during rush hour is to encourage everyone who can to drive instead.
man does the green line suck. the solution to this problem is making the green line suck less. unfortunately that will never ever happen. ever.
oh, ed's take on this? if idiots want to pay an idiotic amount of money to park their cars, ed doesn't care. if you can afford the ridiculous prices for sox tickets and insist on taking your car, then enjoy.
the big dig is more about highways than people driving downtown, and it was never meant to cost billions. we are just stuck with its crappy legacy and boston's old drinking buddy, corruption.