Changes in Housing Lottery: Is Gentrification the New Segregation?

Lottery.jpgBostonist learned from today's Globe that Boston City Councilman Paul Scapicchio (about whom some unrelated, but interesting, news here) wants to change the rules regarding affordable housing lotteries to give priority to neighborhood residents. In the past, similar rules were rejected on the (probably correct, we suspect) theory that favoring neighborhood residents would perpetuate racial segregation (because new housing in, say, a mostly white neighborhood would end up going mostly to white people). But Scapicchio and others are backing the move now because, Scapicchio says, the problem of racial segregation in Boston has been supplanted by gentrification. To this, Bostonist can only say, unironically, "Really?"

We certainly cannot deny that gentrification is an issue, and that affordable housing is scarce and precious (Bostonist is currently vying for one of two available affordable units in a Somerville development; judging from the turnout at the required informational meeting this week, our chances are about 1 in 100). But we're not so sure that segregation is a problem of the past. The fact that Boston as a whole is more diverse now than it was twenty years ago doesn't mean it's more integrated, as Scapicchio's North End district demonstrates. The Councilor optimistically says that "there's a large enough percentage of people of all different races living in most of the neighborhoods that neighborhood preference wouldn't have to mean white preference." Color Bostonist unconvinced.

We also wonder whether preferences might be unfair to residents of neighborhoods where developers fear to tread, since they'd never get preference on new housing (since there's no profit to be made from luxury condos in Mattapan) (yet). Of course, this is all just idle speculation since the Boston Redevelopment Authority (whose acronym is second in our hearts only to the Mass. Organization of State Engineers and Scientists) has doubts about the legality of neighborhood preferences. In the mean time, Bostonist will keep hoping that the bottom falls out of the housing market so we can afford a two-bedroom apartment while our son is still young enough to live with us (we have some time).

Contact the author of this article or email tips@bostonist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Steve

    jon, funding for section 8 and other similar housing voucher programs has been slashed and the waiting list is quite long.

  • So are you guys saying that if I have an advanced degree and choose to use it for public service rather than for the greater personal gain I could get in the private sector, and even though I qualify for affordable housing, I shouldn't take the housing because I could go work at a corporate law firm and make enough money to buy a house at market prices? Are you sure that's a good policy? The cost of law school already discourages a lot of people from working as public defenders, assistant district attorneys, and other low-paid-but-much-needed jobs; should government housing programs make it worse? (And remember, we're talking about a program aimed at what Somerville calls "moderate income" homebuyers. This isn't about helping very poor people find rental housing, and if I get an affordable housing unit, I won't be displacing someone poorer than me - I'll be displacing someone who makes the same amount of money as I do.)

  • ed

    isn't lawyers and students moving into gov. sponsored affordable housing the whole problem with the system? like the post says, the whole point is to help underpriviledged families who would never be able to afford it otherwise. phd students and lawyers are far from underpriviledged and have the potential to make plenty of money while displacing a poor family who may not even have undergrad educations who may not be able to find housing any other way.



    nothing personal, though. i don't fault you for working the system (i might do the same thing), but i doubt the folks who designed the affordable housing had people with advanced degrees in mind as tenants. i'm with you in hoping the housing market crashes sometime soon.

  • What can I tell you? We're clearly too bourgeois for our own good. All I can say is, I'm glad you didn't devise Somerville's affordable housing rules. I take it that, in addition to the income requirement, you would demand spartan frugality from all applicants. . .



    "New sneakers?!! What's wrong with the old ones? You've only had them a year! NO HOUSING FOR YOU!"



    "Fancy dinners out on every wedding anniversary? Unacceptable! NO HOUSING FOR YOU!"

  • Steve

    I just don't think affordable housing was meant for someone who has the means to frequent Sel de la Terre and whose household income will probably double shortly with a Phd in the house. ;)

  • Man, you guys are a tough crowd! I'm not saying I have a tough life - on the contrary, I think I live a pretty comfortable, middle-class existence. But I am a public sector attorney, which means I work for the government, which means I make about the same money as, say, an electrician. And if it makes you feel better about the whole thing, I went to law school with the intention to do public or non-profit work, so I have a load of debt that will probably accompany me to my grave. The folks who run the Somerville affordable housing program say that it doesn't matter if you end up making more money later. The only restriction is that when you sell the place, they set the price so that someone who's in the same position you were when you bought it can afford it. If I qualify under their income guidelines and I'm not lying about my income (which I'm not), I don't see how I'm abusing the system. Is it not good enough that my family is entirely priced out of the home market and will continue to be unless our income increases more drastically than we foresee happening any time soon?

  • Steve

    hmm, an attorney and a soon to be PhD. that seems to be taking advantage of the system bostonist. i don't think that's quite what affordable housing was intended to do.

  • The Beemer is dumb luck: the baby likes pebbles, so when we were out walking, he stopped at that driveway to play with pebbles and I took his picture. The reason I qualify for affordable housing is because, although I am a lawyer, I work in the public sector and my wife is a doctoral student (and we are, obviously, a family of three). Also, Somerville sets aside some units for people who make no more than 80% of median income, and some for folks who make up to 110% of median. (Anyone making minimum wage, by the way, wouldn't be able to afford even the cheaper affordable units.) Anyway, I hope that dispels any malicious rumors about my actual wealth or my aspirations to wealth.

  • The reason why is because that is how expensive the housing market is.

  • ipsofacto

    yeah, isn't "bostonist" an attorney? why are you applying for affordable housing? that doesn't seem to fair to people making minimum wage.

  • If you qualify for affordable housing, how come you posed your baby with a Beemer?

blog comments powered by Disqus

Tips

The day's most popular stories from Bostonist every evening in your inbox from our newsletter.

About Bostonist

Bostonist is a website about Boston. More

Editor: Matthew Gannon

Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

nice
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Bostonist.

All Our RSS