No Junk(ies) in the Park, Please

Almost every morning while Bostonist waits in line at a Somerville Dunkin Donuts there's a good 20 seconds to scan the cover page of the Boston Herald to see what's going on - scorching hot day out? Bikini-clad beachgoer! "Oh it's just 'the Herald' being 'the Herald', right?" How many times has Bostonist seen the Herald's cover page, and chuckled at the latest in sensationalist Bostonian tabloid fare? It's as sure as the sun rising from the east.

This morning though, anyone spotting the front page of the paper, or the website, would notice a prominently displayed article detailing how a Herald photographer spotted three guys shooting up some smack in the middle of Boston's Public Garden, in broad daylight, and took some time to snap some photos. A photo gallery exists on the site in case readers would like a view of the drama unfolding.

Now, when facing such terribly sad and shocking sight, the normal person is faced with a couple of choices:

A) Freak the HELL out and take off.
B) Call or seek out some sort of authorities, immediately.
C) Sit back, cold-chillin', and take some photos knowing very well any one of them could die.

Most people would probably go with "A". Seeing as something like 3 people shooting up in a park is a bit shocking and overwhelming, it's understandable. The proactive and brave ones might go with B, and let their civic responsibilities call them into action. Bostonist, for one, can't fathom going for the final option. This, of course, could lead to discussions on journalistic philosophies, integrity and ethics. Journalists, in some peoples' eyes, have no business interfering. It is their job, to chronicle what's going on "out there". To clarify, the photographer did tell someone after snapping the photos. They hung around and took more photos when "Junkie A" overdosed. Again, that is their job, but ultimately is it right for the Herald to post a series of photos detailing this man OD'ing?

Bostonist wonders what the court of public opinion thinks. Is this another example of the status quo? Or are others similarly taken aback? Is Bostonist being too reactionary?