<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: No Junk(ies) in the Park, Please</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2005/08/26/no_junkies_in_the_park_please.php</link>
<description>All comments for No Junk(ies) in the Park, Please</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2008 cheap_robv</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rvassegh@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rvassegh@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>ed</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2005/08/26/no_junkies_in_the_park_please.php#comment-150817</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2005/08/26/no_junkies_in_the_park_please.php#comment-150817</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2005 10:06:20 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;also there is nothing as fun or easy as judging whether someone acted correctly or not while safely tapping away on a keyboard far from the action at hand .&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>joel</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2005/08/26/no_junkies_in_the_park_please.php#comment-150815</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2005/08/26/no_junkies_in_the_park_please.php#comment-150815</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:14:02 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;After thinking about it for a while I really can&apos;t fault the photographer for anything they did.  The Herald is out there to shock and tittilate and all that crap ... so I shouldn&apos;t be surprised.  I think it&apos;s the combination of all the factors at play that sort of worked up my ire.  Between the fact that this was actually happening, a photog. snapping away at what&apos;s going on, and the herald posting an entire &quot;photo gallery&quot; exploiting what happened ... it sort of made me sick. 

the result, to me, was greater than the sum of its parts.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>ed</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2005/08/26/no_junkies_in_the_park_please.php#comment-150813</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2005/08/26/no_junkies_in_the_park_please.php#comment-150813</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:09:16 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;the dude probably would have died horribly one way or another. i feel bad for his family if this is the way they have to find out about his death. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>jp</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2005/08/26/no_junkies_in_the_park_please.php#comment-150811</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2005/08/26/no_junkies_in_the_park_please.php#comment-150811</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2005 12:49:26 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The photographer&apos;s conduct doesn&apos;t bother me.  Heck, you can walk through the Common most evenings and see the same thing. Does every person who witnesses someone shooting up have an obligation to intervene on the off chance the junkie will die right there? As for the Herald, it doesn&apos;t shock me that they would choose to run those photos -- it is what their readers apparently want from that awful rag.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>