<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: A Condom To Call Our Own?</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2006/02/14/a_condom_to_call_our_own.php</link>
<description>All comments for A Condom To Call Our Own?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Josh</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2006/02/14/a_condom_to_call_our_own.php#comment-151947</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2006/02/14/a_condom_to_call_our_own.php#comment-151947</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:33:38 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, it used to say &quot;MAGNUM&quot; in gold letters above the &quot;Large Size&quot; part. We replaced &quot;MAGNUM&quot; with the Bostonist logo. If the use of a large condom for the illustration strikes you as too immodest, please at least take solace from the subtle implication of size inadequacy in the text (&quot;tellingly?&quot;).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Mike</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2006/02/14/a_condom_to_call_our_own.php#comment-151944</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2006/02/14/a_condom_to_call_our_own.php#comment-151944</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:52:26 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Would it be too much to ask you to replace &quot;Large Size&quot; with &quot;Magnum&quot; while you still have Photoshop open?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>