Hitting the Road...But One Year Later Than Usual?

107939333_0bc5a0d97e_m.jpgAfter waking up this morning and hearing of two fatal car accidents this past weekend, with one involving a 17-year-old girl and her 10-year-old brother both being killed, Bostonist finds it ironic that the front of today’s Globe features an article about raising the driving age for teenagers. State legislators are hoping to have teens wait until they are 17 ½ to obtain their driver’s license in Massachusetts. While some kids can drive at age 15 in this country, this State wants to definitely step up the requirements before allowing teens on the road. The proposed bill wouldn’t allow kids to get their permit until 16 ½, while also increasing the supervised driving hours from the current 12 hours to 50 hours; this would include 10 hours in wintertime and 10 hours at nighttime.

With all the crappy drivers on the road, Bostonist is torn over this newly proposed idea of changing the driving age for first-time drivers. Sure, teens are not the most focused when driving on the roads, but have you ever been behind a Mom in her BMW S.U.V., talking on her cell phone as she attempts to weave in and out of the lane? Why don’t we ban cell phone use while driving and then move on to upping the age requirement for teenagers and driving? (FYI: In Massachusetts, it's up to the town to make it illegal to chat on your cell while driving. So far, Brookline is the only one to choose this option.)

Yet, banning the cell phone would be a tough call for legislators. They wouldn’t be able to order a pizza on their drive home from the State House.


Image courtesy of flickr.com/user: jeff wilcox

Contact the author of this article or email tips@bostonist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Tomas

    I blame both the cops and the state traffic sign people. Why? There aren't enough police pulling people over for speeding. There should be more speed traps set up not only to catch people, but to scare other drivers into slowing down. Coming from Washington, DC, I can attest to the effectiveness of speed traps. VA troopers would be set up every two miles for a ten mile stretch. On some nights, you could trace your way home by the police lights along the highway. In the Boston area, the only time I see police lights is when they're eating donuts while attending to road maintenance crews.

    At night, Mass state police seem to be scarce especially along Rt. 3. You can go 65 in a 55 mph zone and have a car come out of nowhere at 95 mph and pass you. On top of this, there is a lot of weaving in and out of lanes from impatient drivers who don't like the fact that you're going slower than 80.

    And lest I forget, the state sign people are also to blame. Has anyone ever figured out what the "No Turns" signs mean at the end of an off ramp. And with MA's confusing intersections involving more than 5 spokes, why aren't there yield signs? Not that it matters. I've noticed people in the Boston area don't really understand yields anyway.

    In any case, age is not the problem. It is the culture in which these teenagers are brought up in that causes these problems. Teenage driving accidents don't seem to be as bad elsewhere as they are here. If drivers, of all ages, don't learn the consequences of dangerous high speed driving, raising the age limit isn't going to solve the real problem.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Tips

The day's most popular stories from Bostonist every evening in your inbox from our newsletter.

About Bostonist

Bostonist is a website about Boston. More

Editor: Matthew Gannon

Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

nice
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Bostonist.

All Our RSS