<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Herald Reader Defends Scalia&apos;s Rear Flank</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2006/05/24/herald_reader_defends_scalias_rear_flank.php</link>
<description>All comments for Herald Reader Defends Scalia&apos;s Rear Flank</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Grandpa Bostonist</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2006/05/24/herald_reader_defends_scalias_rear_flank.php#comment-152532</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2006/05/24/herald_reader_defends_scalias_rear_flank.php#comment-152532</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 13:52:34 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I am of  the humble opinion that Scalia deserves every attack he gets. Here is one piece of evidence from the slimeball himself:

&quot;Mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>