<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Gay Marriage Amendment: Much Ado About Nothing Yet</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2006/07/13/gay_marriage_amendment_much_ado_about_nothing_yet.php</link>
<description>All comments for Gay Marriage Amendment: Much Ado About Nothing Yet</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>michael</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2006/07/13/gay_marriage_amendment_much_ado_about_nothing_yet.php#comment-272479</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2006/07/13/gay_marriage_amendment_much_ado_about_nothing_yet.php#comment-272479</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jul 2006 15:15:36 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Regarding the relevance of the Romney sign.
It is excellent because the opponents of gay marriage argue that it is an errosion of marriage and that marriage is defined in the bible, basically alleging that it has always been the way it is now.

But clearly marriage has meant different things at different times.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>