<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Geezers Versus Whippersnappers</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2006/12/27/geezers_versus_whippersnappers.php</link>
<description>All comments for Geezers Versus Whippersnappers</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Whippersnapper</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2006/12/27/geezers_versus_whippersnappers.php#comment-862762</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2006/12/27/geezers_versus_whippersnappers.php#comment-862762</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:28:31 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Absolutely right on. The great colleges define Boston as a city. In places like Cambridge the professorial ranks are a significant part of the housing and consumer markets - second only to the students. If part-timers and non-tenure track profs continue to pour in while lifers are not replaced, there should be a big shift to rentals and a decline  in housing values, not to mention a decline in the luster of Cambridge itself.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
