Acoustic Gunshot-Detection: We've Heard it Before

globegraphic_shotspotter07.jpgThe Globe graphic looked oddly familiar. The triangulation of gunshot audio is a comfortable concept, and not some wacky space-age technology we'd never heard about. Where do we turn? Google. We found today's report along with one from the Globe dated February 24, 2006. To give them credit the Globe did modify the graphic from last year, the info is a little different and reporting is largely new info.

It is no secret that Boston has been hearing more gunshots in the last few years – with more homicides recorded as a result. After the record year in 2005 racking up 75 homicides we thought that action was going to be swift to correct the problem. Now, nearly 11 months after the media reported last February on the ShotSpotter technology and how it might benefit the city in cracking down on gun violence, the updated report shows that we're still not there.

City Councilors and the Mayor are working together with the police department to find the $1.5 mil it would cost to install the system in a five or six mile area with the highest gunshot density. The $1.5 million figure has come about in the recent proposal, and the plan is more concrete than the exploration urged last February – but it's still only a drop in the bucket that is the city's $2 billion budget. The technology, as reported earlier, would allow police to pinpoint the location of a gunshot within seconds and dispatch officers to that location. The process is still reactive crime fighting, but if it works it might work as a deterrent in order to prevent crime in the city.

The Globe used the graphic here twice now to illustrate the ShotSpotter story, we'll use it once here under 'fair use' because we're commenting on that very image.

Contact the author of this article or email tips@bostonist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Len

    Given the way that cities shell out money for superfluous classroom technology, I'm amazed that Boston can't come up with the pittance required. I read a news article about the installation of these monitors in Oakland recently. Apparently they are so sensitive that they can detect the caliber of gun involved. They're also very valuable when you consider the fact that earwitnesses can almost never tell you the exact direction from which the sound of a shot came. I remember hearing gunshots during the middle of the day in Oakland without having anything more than the faintest clue as to exactly where they came from. If I'd called the police, I would not have been able to provide any valuable information, such as that which these sensors provide.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Tips

The day's most popular stories from Bostonist every evening in your inbox from our newsletter.

About Bostonist

Bostonist is a website about Boston. More

Editor: Matthew Gannon

Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

nice
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Bostonist.

All Our RSS