The intended hunger strike was announced at the end of the year last year, and executed in the early days of this month. It's over now. On February 16, 2007, professor James Sherley ended his hunger strike and protest outside of the offices of the MIT president and provost. According to the statement he issued
I am ending this part of my struggle. Starting today, I will in fact break my fast, in celebration of the attention that has been brought to bear on issues of equity, diversity, and justice at MIT and in higher education. Carefully modified from the original, my demands are still on the table. I urge the administration to act in good faith, to openly acknowledge and respond to the lines of communication and negotiation that have been in place for two weeks and to find its way to meet these demands.The fast lasted twelve days before Sherley ended the effort. Though Sherley was not granted tenure as a result of his public protest it's apparent from his statement that he feels he has achieved something. Black History month celebrations are upon us, and Sherley ended his strike as MIT celebrated Martin Luther King Day on their campus. They issued a statement of their own acknowledging Sherley's strike
Professor Sherley's protest has focused attention on the effects that race may play in the hiring, advancement and experience of under-represented minority faculty, and on ensuring that our grievance processes are comprehensive, fair and timely. MIT is fully committed to addressing these issuesThe achieved goal seems to be awareness of the issue. Awareness of race issues in the politics of tenure, and, perhaps as a by-product of public attention, some awareness about Sherley's politics of stem cell research. We also learned that if you're working in the MIT News Office it's best to call it a "fast" and not a "hunger strike" for appropriate spin.
Image of "The Buffet" from flickr user Don Fulano
Contact the author of this article or email tips@bostonist.com with further questions, comments or tips.


