City Council Follows Hot Plastic-Bag Ban Trend

042907_plastic_bag.jpgThe Boston City Council wants to follow San Francisco's footsteps and ban plastic bags from the city. Robert Consalvo (Hyde Park / Roslindale / Mattapan) is pushing the measure, and nine of twelve city councilors have offered their support.

We're all for protecting the environment, but the way Robert Consalvo describes those bags, you'd think we were being attacked by plastic bags: "They blow in trees, they're floating in Boston Harbor . . . They're an environmental nightmare. We need to rid our city of these plastic bags."

Do you see that many plastic bags? The blight Consalvo mentions seems to be caused by sloppy people who litter. The bags don't breed like rabbits overnight.

Consalvo's hyperbole aside, plastic bags are bad news for the environment, which is why San Francisco banned them in the first place. The EPA notes that it takes 1,000 years for a plastic bag to decompose. But the EPA also notes that making paper bags kills trees, so you're better off buying a fabric bag and taking it to the store.

Some people get more than one use out of their plastic bags, especially if they have dogs and use the bags to pick up after their pets. Some stores also accept the bags for recycling, but how many of us are going to remember to take the bag back to the store?

Those who actually recycle the bags might be a small minority: "In 2005, 5.2 percent of plastic bags and sacks were recycled, compared with 21 percent of paper bags and sacks, according to the Environmental Protection Agency." What do you think? Is this genuine or hysterical trend-spotting?

Contact the author of this article or email tips@bostonist.com with further questions, comments or tips.

Comments [rss]

  • Elias

    Total hogwash, plastic bag bans.

    Hear, hear! the gentle fluttering sound of the bags in the trees lulls me to sleep at night. And - let's face it - wasn't the real genius in "American Beauty" the proud consumer discarded the bag in the first place? Without him, that dopey kid would have nothing to film!

    Kudos to you, George, for standing up to this emotional hogwash about plastic bags with your cold hard logic and the facts you presumably read to come to your opinion. Long, long live the non-toxic plastic bag!

  • robin..

    Too bad neither George nor Camille bothered to back up their assertions with citations...

    This is a fine ban, but I don't necessarily think the hysteria is justified. The people who are against plastic bags already don't need a ban to convince them; people who don't care probably still won't care.

    I'm definitely surprised that Boston is thinking of this ban, though, given that it's the kind of city in which the Whole Foods near MGH can offer only plastic bags to begin with.

  • George

    The sky is falling.

    Total hogwash, plastic bag bans.

    Remember 15 to 20 years ago the cries of "we're running out of landfill space"? Total hogwash, then, as are the "reasons" for plastic bag bans, today, as sound science will ultimate prove. For example, "smaller and smaller pieces, which are toxic" is absolutely incorrect.

  • camille

    I'm for it ... I don't think this is hyperbolic. Internationally, we use 500 billion to 1 trillion plastic bags every year. This is mindboggling. They don't biodegrade, they merely break down into smaller and smaller pieces, which are toxic. Yick.

    People that pick up their pet's poops might want to get into using a more environmentally friendly option, like biodegradeable bags made for that purpose.

  • egt

    I think the city should put a small tax on the bags - like 15 cents - that would give shoppers an incentive to bring their own bags to the store. This is the policy used in countries like Ireland and it is really effective.

  • Frank

    Are we starting to go overboard with predicting environmental disaster and the effect of the evil plastic bay? Maybe. Would people pay attention otherwise? Umm, probably not. Unfortunately in this world of sensationalism, if it's not a national threat, or a grave danger, people will just go about their lives in blissful ignorance.

    I mostly agree with your points, but if public officials need to scream, "the sky is falling" to pass, arguable, good measures, then so be it.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Tips

The day's most popular stories from Bostonist every evening in your inbox from our newsletter.

About Bostonist

Bostonist is a website about Boston. More

Editor: Matthew Gannon

Publisher: Gothamist

Contribute

Latest Tip:

nice
[more]

Latest Photo:

Recent Comments

Subscribe

Use an RSS reader to stay up to date with the latest news and posts from Bostonist.

All Our RSS