http://bostonist.com/2007/05/22/at_least_it_wasnt_a_baby.php All comments for At Least it Wasn't a Baby en-us 2009 rickbang Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss rick@bostonist.com rick@bostonist.com 60 http://bostonist.com/2007/05/22/at_least_it_wasnt_a_baby.php#comment-1103340 http://bostonist.com/2007/05/22/at_least_it_wasnt_a_baby.php#comment-1103340 Comments Tue, 22 May 2007 16:35:03 -0500 <p>Delightful! "Sad little faces" indeed. Hip hooray for MacDougall in the hizouse!!!</p> http://bostonist.com/2007/05/22/at_least_it_wasnt_a_baby.php#comment-1103202 http://bostonist.com/2007/05/22/at_least_it_wasnt_a_baby.php#comment-1103202 Comments Tue, 22 May 2007 15:24:12 -0500 <p>What a scary and unsurprising story about a day in the life of an MBTA commuter. It seems that despite MBTA 'official' promises of better service and safter travel, the MBTA has gone out of its way to make riding the 'T' a tedious and dangerous affair. In the past 2 years riding the train, trolley, and bus I've experienced numerous incidences where I feared for my life...be it by equipment failure, lack of skill/reckless behavior of operators, or behavior of passengers. And the coup de gras is that the MBTA couldn't care less. For a service that thousands rely on daily its incomprehensible to me that instances like this still occur and are seemingly 'unfixable.' I could be wrong be we are living in 2007 here...</p>