<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Your Turbines are so Big…</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/06/26/your_turbines_a.php</link>
<description>All comments for Your Turbines are so Big…</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/06/26/your_turbines_a.php#comment-1136307</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/06/26/your_turbines_a.php#comment-1136307</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:22:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;FWIW this article could have used a more vigorous editing session before being posted.

More importantly, I am curious as to the meaning of the statement, &quot;...even if the practical uses of the technology aren&apos;t yet in place.&quot; The &quot;practical use&quot; of the technology is that electricity generated by the windmills (such as the one in Hull) is put onto the grid at a cost (financial and environmental) far less than fossil-fuel generated energy. What&apos;s not &quot;practical&quot;, and what&apos;s not &quot;in place&quot;, about that?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>