<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Photo of the Day: July 24, 2007</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/07/24/photo_of_the_da_20.php</link>
<description>All comments for Photo of the Day: July 24, 2007</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/07/24/photo_of_the_da_20.php#comment-1155478</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/07/24/photo_of_the_da_20.php#comment-1155478</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 00:03:45 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm...methinks that if the picture was taken anywhere *near* a Big Dig tunnel, it would have come out completely shaken up. For FOURTEEN BILLION DOLLARS, was it really too much to ask that the roadways actually be, y&apos;know, smooth? Maybe cambered properly? Maybe featuring signage that is consistent and helpfully placed? Never mind that the project ran years late, went billions of dollars over budget, still leaks more than it should, and was tragically fatal to one user -- the roadways themselves SUCK. How is that even REMOTELY POSSIBLE after all that went on? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>guest</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/07/24/photo_of_the_da_20.php#comment-1154903</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/07/24/photo_of_the_da_20.php#comment-1154903</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 14:15:08 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Anybody know how to &quot;unguest&quot; yourself and use a real login to comment? &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
