<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Boston Can Live Without T-Radio</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/10/26/boston_can_live.php</link>
<description>All comments for Boston Can Live Without T-Radio</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>rickbang</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/10/26/boston_can_live.php#comment-1226038</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/10/26/boston_can_live.php#comment-1226038</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:26:26 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Dashford, I&apos;m a little confused. Which T station has a constant stream of trains passing through?

Nobody, including the T itself through its press releases, has suggested that T radio is somehow going to prevent a future fare hike. And the T has been very evasive about where the money from advertising is going. Is it going to fix the Orange line so trains stop flipping over? Or is it going to the media group who runs the station?  Do you have those numbers, or are you just a funny panda?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>dashford</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/10/26/boston_can_live.php#comment-1225938</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/10/26/boston_can_live.php#comment-1225938</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:49:02 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;I&apos;m underground, in a tunnel, with trains passing through.  But BAD RADIO???  I won&apos;t allow it!&quot;

Sure, I get that.  Bring on the higher fares.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
