<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: It&apos;s All in the Police Details--Or Is It?</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/11/06/its_all_in_the.php</link>
<description>All comments for It&apos;s All in the Police Details--Or Is It?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>aging cynic</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/11/06/its_all_in_the.php#comment-1230965</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/11/06/its_all_in_the.php#comment-1230965</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:30:27 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It&apos;s unfortunate that the police unions allow their members to be trivialized by this system. Either 49 states are right or MA is. Pay these professionals a salary that reflects the stresses and the dangers, without making them the equivalent of security guards at triple pay. No one should need to work more than 60-70 hours per week to get their job done. (Ask any lawyer about feeding the &quot;billable hours beast&quot;). If they have a legitimate master&apos;s degree,(Quinn Bill makes that dubious), make their pay comparable to other similarly-degreed public servants. At some point, public employment should not be something you do for the money. Teachers don&apos;t seem to have a problem realizing their time limitations for outside work (and they don&apos;t carry guns).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
