http://bostonist.com/2007/11/12/sports_redux_no_4.php All comments for Sports Redux: Nothin's Gonna Touch You In These Golden Years en-us 2009 rickbang Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss rick@bostonist.com rick@bostonist.com 60 http://bostonist.com/2007/11/12/sports_redux_no_4.php#comment-1234179 http://bostonist.com/2007/11/12/sports_redux_no_4.php#comment-1234179 Comments Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:46:07 -0500 <p>BC is what we thought BC is. Good but not truly ready for prime time. If they win Saturday, they'll be in the ACC title game and could end up in a major bowl game. Only the most intoxicated triple eagles thought they'd actually play for the national title. More important in front-running media news is the growth in sign A-Rod feeding frenzy. Media types from Massarotti to Lobel to Shaughnessy to Gary Tanguay (okay, he's the JV) already have their A-Rod kneepads on and have assumed the position. At least Michael Felger is not joining in the A-Rod foreplay. Bears watching...</p> http://bostonist.com/2007/11/12/sports_redux_no_4.php#comment-1234068 http://bostonist.com/2007/11/12/sports_redux_no_4.php#comment-1234068 Comments Mon, 12 Nov 2007 10:59:23 -0500 <p>Michael, I would suggest that those of us who supported the Sox and Pats prior to their championships enjoyed said championships even more. Re BC, things are never quite as bad or as good as the front-running media portrays. If you choose to no longer follow them now that they have lost a couple, that's OK.(A bit more appropriate for the Gothamist however, IMHO). BC is still in the hunt for the championship of the football conference they just joined. Things could be a lot worse.</p>