<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: MittWatch: Mitt Romney&apos;s Willie Horton?</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/11/26/mitt_romneys_wi.php</link>
<description>All comments for MittWatch: Mitt Romney&apos;s Willie Horton?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 MJG</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:03:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>mgann@aol.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>mgann@aol.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>MJG</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/11/26/mitt_romneys_wi.php#comment-1240751</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/11/26/mitt_romneys_wi.php#comment-1240751</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:47:46 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The interesting thing is that it&apos;ll be another Republican (hi, Rudy) who should be the first to demagogue on this matter. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>aging cynic</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/11/26/mitt_romneys_wi.php#comment-1240586</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/11/26/mitt_romneys_wi.php#comment-1240586</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:02:02 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;What Romney was thinking was &quot;she can get by the Judicial Nominating Commission&quot;. News flash, Republicans are like unicorns around here. Did you think he would nominate a conservative Republican? People hear what they want to hear. (How else to explain that Dukakis and Salvucci had nothing to do with the Big Dig, except for the good stuff)? Not to confuse you with facts or anything, but you might want to examine whether his &quot;decision&quot; is analogous to the Willie Horton issue. The judge made the decision, not Romney. Go back and check the clippings on the Dukakis campaign, (a good keyword is &quot;Sasso&quot;). For YOU the comparison may be easy to draw. For those not demagoguing the issue, not so much.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>