<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Google Street View Update</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/12/14/google_street_v.php</link>
<description>All comments for Google Street View Update</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>OldProfessorBear</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/12/14/google_street_v.php#comment-1252247</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/12/14/google_street_v.php#comment-1252247</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 19:47:50 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Cambridge seems to be totally covered, likewise Somerville as far as I can tell. Possibly even Watertown and Arlington, not sure.

There are a few holes even in Boston Proper, however. Parts of Chinatown seem to be missing, for example, and some other downtown bits and pieces. Curious.

Too bad they don&apos;t cover pedestrian-only streets. I find the automobile orientation irritating. (But, then, I don&apos;t own one myself.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Caroline Roberts</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/12/14/google_street_v.php#comment-1252093</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/12/14/google_street_v.php#comment-1252093</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:17:28 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;HarmyG, you have a point that not everyone would want to roam around aimlessly in Dorchester. But not all of Dorchester is a BPD-labeled &quot;hot spot.&quot; And I probably should have mentioned that chunks of other places were left out, like Roslindale.

The main point is that Google&apos;s decisions appear arbitrary, and I&apos;m still not quite satisfied with their answer. But, if Google&apos;s goal is to get street view for practically every city, then those neighborhoods will get mapped eventually.
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>MapsRus</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/12/14/google_street_v.php#comment-1251870</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/12/14/google_street_v.php#comment-1251870</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:12:44 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm...Certainly it would appear some of the seedier areas have been missed...especially in Detroit:

Google Street View Sightings&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>MapsRus</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/12/14/google_street_v.php#comment-1251869</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/12/14/google_street_v.php#comment-1251869</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 12:12:30 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm...Certainly it would appear some of the seedier areas have been missed...especially in Detroit:

Google Street View Sightings&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>HarmyG</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2007/12/14/google_street_v.php#comment-1251784</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2007/12/14/google_street_v.php#comment-1251784</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:38:37 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Chill out about Dorchester already.  Would BOSTONIST like to drive up and down all of the streets of Dorchester?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>