Bostonist: Reason Number One the Pats Lost?

Lyss

Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:06:59 -0500

Don't forget about the khaki pants that replaced his usual shorts/sweatpants. They could have been just as damning.

TimSPC

Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:59:17 -0500

"We're only going to score 17 points?" Brady said. "OK. Is Plax playing defense? I wish he had said 45-42 and gave us a little credit for scoring more points."

MJG

Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:54:40 -0500

This is the time for humor. It beats the truth.

yuppiescum

Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:18:12 -0500

This is not the time for humor. The giants outplayed and outcoached the pats, and it's that simple, and there's nothing funny about it to me. Is that something that you can understand?

allie25

Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:16:41 -0500

im sure this is partyl giselle's fault.

Mac

Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:17:01 -0500

I don't think some of these commenters understand the concept of humor. Especially you, yuppiescum. Do you realize that your name is ambiguous? Do you fully understand the humor in your own name?

Nora Rocket

Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:23:59 -0500

Man, all this blame and no credit: the number one reason the Pats lost was the Giants. It wasn't the panty model or TapeGate or hubris (well, maybe a little hubris...) or the hoodie. Any number of people could have worn any number of things, but unless one of those people-things combos was Brady-jetpack, the Giants played some damned football, with sacks and pressure and a few astounding plays, and that's why the Pats lost: because someone else won.

Trix

Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:08:25 -0500

Ha! Everyone at our party said the same thing from the minute we saw it. We were hoping one of those famous halftime adjustments would be to switch to the gray hoodie.

yuppiescum

Mon, 04 Feb 2008 11:43:27 -0500

Worst sportswriting ever.