<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Was the Unsexiest Men Issue Unsexy Enough?</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/04/03/boston-phoenix-unsexiest.php</link>
<description>All comments for Was the Unsexiest Men Issue Unsexy Enough?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Sam Boston</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/04/03/boston-phoenix-unsexiest.php#comment-1535412</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/04/03/boston-phoenix-unsexiest.php#comment-1535412</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 12:26:45 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;The Phoenix updated their unsexy list with the Top 5 Unsexiest Who Proved Us Wrong, Top 5 Unsexiest Who Proved Us Right, and Top 5 Unsexiest Additions. You can view the updates here: http://thephoenix.com/Boston/News/73248-100-Unsexiest-Men-of-the-Year-Follow-Up/?page=1#TOPCONTENT&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>miz_dj</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/04/03/boston-phoenix-unsexiest.php#comment-1329572</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/04/03/boston-phoenix-unsexiest.php#comment-1329572</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:51:07 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;unlikeable IS unsexy, really. I wouldn&apos;t sex someone I didn&apos;t like. Unless, you know, they were...well...I see your point, but still. maybe they are trying to &quot;push the envelope on what sexy means&quot;, or something similarly marketing-esque.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>