<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Law &amp; Order Hates Tom Brady</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php</link>
<description>All comments for Law &amp; Order Hates Tom Brady</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 austinist_kerry</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:00:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>kerry@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>kerry@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Dreamboat Baby</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347964</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347964</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:55:05 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I do not understand the hoopla, or even the reference to Father.  Clearly the show is defaming former Bills QB Jim Kelly.  like the old saying goes, &quot;If you goe to the Super Bowl 4 times in a row and can&apos;t seal the deal, you deserve to be called a closeted gay murderer.&quot;  I can&apos;t remember exactly where I read that, but I&apos;m pretty sure it was the bible.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>bettyblack</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347711</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347711</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:08:15 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you!

My boyfriend was convinced it was one of the Manning boys getting picked on, but the supermodel girlfriend and the endorsement deal -- did they actually shamelessly NAME Smartwater in the ep? I really think they did! -- seemed pretty obvious to me. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>MJG</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347663</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347663</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:34:44 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if TB will respond to this. It&apos;s odd they&apos;d be that specific for a show.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Kerry Skemp</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347643</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347643</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 10:17:58 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;shipping magnet, i think, is far more interesting.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>LyetteAnn</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347529</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347529</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:07:14 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, bugger. My editors are totally going to have to get me a copy of Homonyms For Dummies.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>bigyaz</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347368</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1347368</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:56:52 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;shipping magnet&quot;??? Guess that would explain the attraction...
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>JET Moynahan</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1346852</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/04/24/law_order_hates.php#comment-1346852</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:26:42 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;we imagine the precocious tyke will have something to say about this sad situation.&quot;

No Comment.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>