<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Gloucester Pregnancy Pact Actually Baby-Raising Pact: Well, That Makes It All Okay!</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/06/24/gloucester_pregnancy_pact_actually.php</link>
<description>All comments for Gloucester Pregnancy Pact Actually Baby-Raising Pact: Well, That Makes It All Okay!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>wallace</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/06/24/gloucester_pregnancy_pact_actually.php#comment-1392598</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/06/24/gloucester_pregnancy_pact_actually.php#comment-1392598</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 03:15:26 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;There&apos;s another angle to consider as well. Those underage teenage old girls having babies is okay as long as you do it under religious &quot;cover&quot; (ala the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (FLDS) in Texas/polygamist sect). I guess you could say at least their daddies aren&apos;t homeless or stoned...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>