<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: MassDebate: Preserve History or Build Business?</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/07/19/massdebate_preserve_boston_or_build.php</link>
<description>All comments for MassDebate: Preserve History or Build Business?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>anon617</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/07/19/massdebate_preserve_boston_or_build.php#comment-1434602</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/07/19/massdebate_preserve_boston_or_build.php#comment-1434602</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 17:27:34 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Tear down an attractive old building so you can build an ugly, generic-looking new building? Pluh-eeze!

Druker cares nothing for the architectural integrity or the neighborhood. He is after all a developer and will do what he can to maximize his profits and allow him to build the biggest and most profitable building he can. Preservation be damned.

The BRA has no credibility anywhere in Boston.  Their checkered past, blatant corruption, ignoring the needs and desires of neighborhoods, and abuse of eminent domain laws have made them the villain they deserve to be in Boston.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>