<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Cinemasmith Sale!</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/09/19/cinemasmith_sale.php</link>
<description>All comments for Cinemasmith Sale!</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>Nora Rocket</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/09/19/cinemasmith_sale.php#comment-1466423</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/09/19/cinemasmith_sale.php#comment-1466423</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:37:16 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;As I understand the use of &quot;cannibalized&quot; in a business context, it means that the &quot;eaten&quot; component and the &quot;eater&quot; are owned by the same parent company.  Starbucks A three doors down from Starbucks B is Starbucks cannibalizing; two newly merged book imprints competing for the same adoptions is cannibalizing the textbook market of the parent co.; but one business going under because another business provides the same product in a different manner isn&apos;t quite cannibalism.

I could be wrong, but I think cannibalising the market has a different denotation than as used here, if what you do mean is &quot;Netflix PWND Cinemasmith,&quot; which is what I thought you meant.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Brian_Foley</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2008/09/19/cinemasmith_sale.php#comment-1466405</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2008/09/19/cinemasmith_sale.php#comment-1466405</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:24:01 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;It was cannibalized by Netflix.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
