http://bostonist.com/2009/01/14/globe_reruns_nyt_article_with_no_co.php All comments for Globe Reruns NYT Article with No Comment or Credit and a Different Dateline en-us 2009 cheap_robv Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:00:00 -0500 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss rvassegh@gmail.com rvassegh@gmail.com 60 http://bostonist.com/2009/01/14/globe_reruns_nyt_article_with_no_co.php#comment-1563671 http://bostonist.com/2009/01/14/globe_reruns_nyt_article_with_no_co.php#comment-1563671 Comments Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:23:50 -0500 <p>Also, both articles seem to have the dateline West Babylon (although the formatting seems screwed up for both of them.) They do seem to have different publication dates though. Did you confuse the dateline (usually the location the story was published from. See the AP">http://www.bu.edu/com/writingprgm/ap_styleguide1.pdf">AP Style Guide) for the publication date? </p> http://bostonist.com/2009/01/14/globe_reruns_nyt_article_with_no_co.php#comment-1563668 http://bostonist.com/2009/01/14/globe_reruns_nyt_article_with_no_co.php#comment-1563668 Comments Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:11:01 -0500 <p>Boston.com (not the Boston Globe) has been running New York Times travel, health, and education content for about five years or so. I don't have time to look for the earliest possible example, but one that I could quickly find from a few years ago is Patterns: If It Takes a Long Time, It May Be a Boy. It is also clearly marked as being a New York Times article with the Times logo next to the headline. The same way that Boston.com differentiates AP content with an AP Logo, Reuters, Bang Showbiz, Fodors, or any of their content providers. What made you think that this was something new or noteworthy?</p>