<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Bostonist: Skepchick: Did the Boston Globe Trade Science for Religion?</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2009/03/19/skepchick_the_boston_globe_mixes_sc.php</link>
<description>All comments for Skepchick: Did the Boston Globe Trade Science for Religion?</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>2009 rickbang</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:00:52 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<managingEditor>rick@bostonist.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>rick@bostonist.com</webMaster>
<ttl>60</ttl>
<item>
<title>mmfiore</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2009/03/19/skepchick_the_boston_globe_mixes_sc.php#comment-1619145</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2009/03/19/skepchick_the_boston_globe_mixes_sc.php#comment-1619145</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:40:04 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;We are a group that is challenging the current paradigm in physics which is Quantum Mechanics and String Theory. There is a new Theory of Everything Breakthrough. It exposes the flaws in both Quantum Theory and String Theory. Please Help us set the physics community back on the right course and prove that Einstein was right! Visit our site The Theory of Super Relativity: 
href=&quot;http://www.superrelativity.org/&quot; title=&quot;Super Relativity&quot;&gt;Super Relativity&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>curse10</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2009/03/19/skepchick_the_boston_globe_mixes_sc.php#comment-1616124</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2009/03/19/skepchick_the_boston_globe_mixes_sc.php#comment-1616124</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:24:07 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Lovely.  MSM kicks science in the nuts once again.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item><item>
<title>Blake Stacey</title>
<link>http://bostonist.com/2009/03/19/skepchick_the_boston_globe_mixes_sc.php#comment-1616061</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://bostonist.com/2009/03/19/skepchick_the_boston_globe_mixes_sc.php#comment-1616061</guid>
<category>Comments</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:44:19 -0500</pubDate>
<description>&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m always puzzled by the people who say, &quot;The answer to question X is fundamentally unknowable&quot;, and then turn around and go, &quot;By making up stuff that sounds pretty and &apos;spiritual&apos;, we can know about X!&quot;  If it&apos;s behind an impenetrable veil of unknowability, how can you claim that you know it has anything to do with the art you happen to like, or the religion you happened to inherit?

Just because the ghost of Heisenberg appeared to you during a wicked mushroom trip and explained what quantum physics is all about, doesn&apos;t mean that explanation is true.

Er, not that that&apos;s ever happened.  Certainly not to me.  And definitely not in Amsterdam Centraal.

The prize is the largest of its kind in the world (its founder stipulated that it always be greater than the Nobel prize),

This is what we specialists refer to, in technical terms, as &quot;dick-waving&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>