Sports Redux: Pats Fans: Feel The Schadenfreude
Kells Closing
Photo of the Day, February 8, 2010: Alewife Station
Scott Brown: 41st Vote or Campaign Prop?
Sports Redux: "Bad Luck, Story of My Season, Nothing Can Go Right"
Cute in a stupid ass way. The Hurricanes' Scott Walker (not pictured) will not be suspended for sucker punching Aaron Ward during last night's NHL playoff game.
Word has just arrived from the NHL that Carolina Hurricanes wing Scott Walker will be fined $2,500 for rearranging Aaron Ward's face at the end of last night's game, but he will not be suspended.
The punishment is the second of a one-two sucker punch—a more accurate metaphor might be a sucker punch team-up—because the NHL rules prescribe an automatic suspension (subject to league review) for any player who receives a fight instigator penalty during the last five minutes of a game. Walker's instigator penalty came with just under 3 minutes left to play.
The sucker punch (below) was only the capstone of a game where the ordinarily well poised and sportsmanlike Hurricanes turned petulant. A side effect of getting their asses handed to them in a 19-shot shut-out? Maybe. Hurricanes general manager Jim Rutherford thinks that the Bruins had it coming, "After our team received several punches throughout the series leading up to Game 5, it was a matter of time before one was going to be thrown back."
Bruins coach Claude Julien begs to differ:
"In reviewing what I saw, I just didn't like what happened. ... I just don't think there was any need for that," Julien said after practice in Wilmington, Mass. "He sucker-punched him once coming into the scrum when [Ward] was involved with another player. And then he dropped his gloves and sucker-punched him."I don't care what people say about, 'Ward should've protected himself.' He had no intention of getting involved," he added. "We asked our guys to stay composed and not fall into that trap, and he just did that. A guy with Walker's experience should know better than to sucker-punch a guy."
Why did the NHL rescind the suspension? Our guess is ratings. Game 6, to be played Tuesday in Raleigh, will be a bloodbath.
Kelly Greene contributed to this post.
add to stumble upon
add to reddit
tweet this
post to facebook
Well, whether he PLAYS Game 6 or not has gone from being determined by the league to determined by an angry group of Black and Gold.
The rule clearly states " The Director of Hockey Operations will review every such incident and may rescind the suspension based on a number of criteria..."
There is both an automatic suspension and an automatic review for these incidents. In reality the rulebook should just note that each of these incidents will be reviewed by the league but saying that you are suspending first and reviewing later sounds like you're tougher on penalties.
I have no problem with the Bruins going out for retaliation since they'll end up watching the game from the box.. I'm a 'Canes fan. :)
Right. What's at issue is not whether the league could rescind the suspension but why. A sucker punch is a sucker punch, and if it been Milan Lucic delivering it, suspension would only be the start of the disciplinary action.
It was an ugly, ugly play from a team that doesn't make many of them.
Wanted to add that I don't condone what Walker did, just reminding everyone that rule 47.22 is a rather obtuse.
If game six reverts to Adams division rules, it's probably due to Walker's non-suspension. I'd bet it will HELP the Bruins, tho.
The big difference between Walker and Lucic is past history of infractions.