To provide an update on our MassDebate articles opposing and "meh"-ing the proposed redevelopment of the Shreve, Crump & Low building, it seems that Back Bay residents have united in strong opposition to the proposed modernist design, prompting the Boston Redevelopment Authority to put the project on hold. Citizens say there's too much glass, not enough tribute to the way the building used to be, and nothing "Boston" about it. Developer Ronald Druker says "We have an obligation to do a contemporary building and not to do a cartoon of a Back Bay building from the 19th century... Office buildings require consistency, and that's what we're in the process of creating." Consistent with what, we ask--genericness?
Results tagged “bostonrealestate”
Yesterday, Dan Shea weighed in against demolishing the Shreve, Crump & Low building in Back Bay. Today we argue the opposing side. Bostonist does not officially endorse any particular view on this matter.
Bostonist is introducing a new feature, MassDebate (yes, it's as massdebatory as it sounds!), in which we present the opposing sides of a controversial local issue. If you have a hot-button topic you'd like to see us cover, or if you want to represent your view on a subject under debate, email us at tips at bostonist dot com. Bostonist does not endorse any opinions expressed in MassDebate.
O Holy Condo, your fees are so expensive: Concord Baptist Church in the South End may be turned into some condos. We ask, where would Jesus live? [Boston Real Estate Blog]
